1) Orientalism helps to create and shape entire new fields. It also
used in English, history, anthropology, political science and cultural studies.
It gives deep information of people of middle east people about their culture
and behaviour. We come to know about them yet we never meet. Orientalism
questions the reasons behind the impression of any community or nation as a bad
and why the whole community and nation have to suffer because of the mistakes
of one or two groups from that community.
2) In Western Countries, the representation of East by media was in
such a way that all western people were thinking about Eastern people as a
Black magicians and mysterious people. They were not aware of the culture of
East and that is why they have considered it as mysterious place, the word
‘mysterious’ itself creates the feeling or horror. So as a result the human
side of Islamic and especially Arab world are rarely found in any Western
country’s movies and in people’s mindset. Orientalism is the creates an image
outside of history of something that is placid and still and eternal. Which is
simply contradicted by the fact of history.
3) Said’s analysis of Orientalism is not just a description of its
content but a sustained argument for why it looks the way it does. it’s an examination
of the quite concrete, historical and institution context that creates it.
Specifically Said locates the construction of orientalism within the history of
Imperial conquest.
4) The difference between British and French Orientalism on the one
hand and the American experience of the Orient on the other is that the
American one is more indirect, much more based on abstractions’ in the past,
British and Franch orientalism is direct and how the American Orientalism is
indirect. It question the power system in terms of media, popular culture and
globalization.
5) Gramsci says, ‘therefore the task at the outset, is to try to
compile an inventory’, in other words to try and make sense of it, and this
seems to me to be the most interesting sort of human task. It’s a task of
giving history some shape and sense, for a particular reason, not just to show
that my history is better than your or my history is worse than yours. I am a
victim and you are somebody who’s oppressed people or so on, but rather, to
understand my history in terms of other people’s history, in other words to try
to understand, to move beyond, to generalize one’s own individual experience to
the experience of others and I think the great goal is in fact to become
someone else.”
No comments:
Post a Comment